Blogs
Who should be the commissioner of advisers?
Wednesday 28th of January 2009
As I mentioned in the previous Blog one of the big events of this year, and one which will set the scene for advisers, is the appointment of a commissioner of financial advisers.
My view, and one shared by others, is that this person will set the tone for the industry and be a leading figure.
So who should get the job?
Well we have been trying to find out a bit more about what is happening with this process but are finding that the Ministry of Economic Development is being pretty uncooperative. We understand there is a short list of candidates and that an industry group has been set up to help.
While we don’t expect to see the short-list, finding out who is on this committee shouldn’t be too hard. But it is.
Coming back to the appointment, I would make this comment: The person who gets the job needs to be someone who has some knowledge of the advisory industry and its workings and it needs to be somebody who has a pragmatic approach to advisers.
What we don’t want to see is a bureaucrat taking charge. Nor do we want to see some lawyer looking for a nice little earner to end their career on.
I hear, unfortunately, that the short list has no-one with a lot of industry, or let’s say practitioner experience. While we don’t want a lawyer or a bureaucrat, we likewise don’t want a failed financial planner!
I was toying with the idea of running a poll like the Herald did to find the greatest New Zealander (Helen Clark won BTW). But I wouldn’t do that – unless of course you wanted to nominate someone!
Comments (1)
W K
I think the priority is not who should be the commissioner of advisers, the immediate focus should be to regulate all investment products, especially finance companies. There is no point regulating advisers when there is no control over the number of dodgy finance companies with unscrupulous directors popping up all over the place.
Personally, I do not see the point in having a bunch of professional advisors while dodgy investment products floods the market.
Current laws permit someone unscrupulous to set up dodgy finance companies. There is no minimum NPL, no minimum paid-up capital, no restriction for loans to related companies, no authority with the power to audit financial institutions without appointment and prosecute offending directors and shut down their operations. In short, there is absolutely no protection for investors now, the "regulators" simply place the responsiblities on advisors. What's the role of the regulator for these finance companies, or is there one to protect investors?
0
0
15 years ago
2 min read