News

Goal based advice increases in popularity

Thursday 24th of February 2011

NZ Funds Management has reported a shift in its clients towards goal-based advice and believes this is a trend that is set to continue as advisers, prompted by new regulations, re-document their clients' investment plans.

The company said goals-based advice has more than doubled for clients of advisers using their investment portfolios, with clients with assets of $31 million shifting from traditionally structured portfolios to those built around client goals in the last quarter to December 31.

"Our expectation is that over time, the majority of clients in New Zealand - individuals, families and family trusts, will, with the assistance of advisers move to some form of goal based advice and investment - away from the disappointment of traditional approaches," said NZ Funds principal Glenn Wright.

Unlike traditional portfolio approaches, described by Wright as driven by a pension fund type mentality where a single diversified portfolio is constructed with performance measured against market benchmarks, a goals based approach links peoples' individual finance goals to several separate investment portfolios.

"A goal based approach essentially applies the principles and insights gained from research in the field of behavioural finance by taking into account how people, their money, and their behaviour intersect as their assets and lives change throughout life," Wright said.

Okke Hansen, director and partner at Resource Financial Planning, is one adviser who has revisited his clients' portfolios using a goals-based advice process.

"I want to build on the values based discovery process we have used successfully with clients," he said.

"The key for me is to apply risk management and downside protection across all of our clients' portfolios.

"The combination of a searching discussion with clients about their goals and needs, and implementing several discrete portfolios as a result of these discussions, each with a ‘client purpose' appeals to the individuals and families that we work with."

Comments (6)
alan milton
I found the comments of Glenn Wright and Okke Hansen largely unintelligable. As Keith Walter said,: So what's new?
0 0
13 years ago

W K
If this article is a reflection of current practices of financial / investment / insurance advisors, then no wonder the rush into this new financial services regulation. Needs analysis, which of course includes goal setting (just in case some are still not aware), has been around since at least the 1980s. I am now unsure if I am moving forward or backwards in this industry with people in the same biz telling me things that had been in practice for at least the last 30yrs.
0 0
13 years ago

Clayton Coplestone
If this is a revelation, then the industry is in dire straits.
0 0
13 years ago

Richard James
I can only conclude from the comments that our message here was not well conveyed. What we are tallking about is the shift our advisory clients are making toward liability driven investing for individuals allied to portfolio construction with a behavioural finance overlay. In other words, true wealth management. We are applying detailed goal definition, quantification and scheduling processes along with scenario planning to accurately and realistically match individual's current and future assets to their future liabilities and then structuring their wealth into a series of discrete portfolios each purpose built to meet those discretely defined goals. From my experience, there are very, very few advisers in New Zealand who are conducting such a process with any real coherency between the advice process and the management of the portfolio. If you would like to read a little more about the philosophical underpinnings go to http://www.nzfunds.co.nz/docs/behaviouralfinance.pdf
0 0
13 years ago

Clayton Coplestone
Thanks Richard & Glenn for clearing this up My response remains: If this is a revelation, then the industry is in dire straits
0 0
13 years ago

alan milton
I've just read the article. In it, it is suggested that each client has a series of portfolios to cover immediate, short term, long term and growth assets, thus ring-fencing each objective. But markets ebb and flow and surely there will be a need to regularly switch assets from one portfolio to another, eg if short term rates or bond yields rise or fall, ditto dividend yields, share prices or the currency. I don't see why this can't be done within a single portfolio. How would the system cope with the fall in T/D rates from 8% to 3% when the stock market is steaming ahead? And isn't "Total return" an important consideration? Has research been done to support the idea of separate portfolios?
0 0
13 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.