Insurance

Asteron increases commission

Thursday 17th of May 2012

Upfront year one commission moves from 80% to 100%, retention year one option increases from 60% to 80% and level option moves from 17.5% to 20% in years one onward.

The changes, which took effect this week, apply to all new business applications and those currently awaiting issue.

Asteron managing director David Carter said the commission changes, and an earlier change to Asteron’s heart attack definition, were largely the result of discussions with advisers, saying they had a “massive influence on the decision.”

“Some of the things that emerged was they’d [advisers] like us to be simpler and easier to do business with, and a reminder it’s important to be competitive on remuneration terms as well,” Carter said.

“This is really about simplifying the offer. All the other products had a different commission rate on them and it makes it easier for people to understand.”

Carter also said the company was considering further commission changes and would soon announce additional plans aimed at making it easier for advisers to conduct business with them, promising a “significant launch” at the start of July. 

“We’re consistently looking at how we want to position our remuneration offer,” he said.

“We will look to try and keep it simple and easy to understand and we want to make sure our remuneration is competitive.”

Comments (5)
Andy Phillipson
Who cares about commission levels if we are to do what is right for our CLIENTS (In terms of the FAA)? It is Superior and un-confusing products that we (and our clients) need!
0 0
12 years ago

Mike Naylor
Commission is vital to creating a vibrant adviser business. However they need to cut year one commission and increase ongoing trail commission in subsequent years - and tie it to on-going client service. This way advisers will have to ensure they provide good service so clients stay with them.
0 0
12 years ago

Daryl McAlinden
Aren't you running a business Andy re increase in commission revenue? Independent research does place Asteron at or near the top, especially their "Loss of Earnings" definition on their DI - a superior product with "un-confusing" definitions! Mike, they also provide a choice for ongoing renewal commissions. ...and no, I do not work for Asteron, I'm a non-aligned adviser.
0 0
12 years ago

Ron Flood
"This is exactly why commissions need to be stripped out of insurance products". Yes, Anon, but only if you want less product to be sold or you want to work in a bank, on salary, selling insurance. Imagine for a minute a client who has paid a fee to have cover in place and then finds a better cover. This could be for a number of reasons such as having a broker who couldn't place business with the new insurer, whose product was superior or the broker getting a new agency with a company that offers better products. If he wasn't in a position to pay another fee he would be disadvantaged. For a number of years I, and others, have tried to promote the following idea. Maybe now is the time for companies and/or regulators to consider it. If you replace an existing policy in the interests of the client you would receive 20% level commission each month on the amount of premium being replaced. If the new premium exceeded the old one, you could elect to take upfront on the increase or level, your choice. If the old premium was $200 per month and the new premium $240, you would be paid $40 per month (no claw back)and the balance at upfront or level whichever you prefer. If the new premium was less than the old one, you would just receive 20% each month as each premium was paid. If an adviser knowingly replaced a policy, but took upfront commission and didn't notify the new insurer, they would be banned from the industry and removed as an Authorised or Registered Financial Adviser. With a new rating agency entering the marketplace we may see more policies being replaced as a result of their research. If this proves to be the case then a change as mentioned above may be one way of confirming that business is being replaced for the right reasons. (Please note that these views are my own and not to be taken as the views of the two Professional Bodies I belong too nor the Ginger Group, of which I am also a member).
0 0
12 years ago

Ray Storey
Anon- Do you really think charging a fee creates any less bias than receiving a commission? You're dreaming if you are.
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.