Insurance

Consider trauma instead of medical cover: Partners

Friday 24th of May 2013

Hayden Jonas addressed the Institute of Financial Advisers conference in Auckland yesterday.

He stepped in at the last minute for Naomi Ballantyne, who was called off to an urgent meeting.

Jonas said there was a perception that medical insurance was not sustainable because up to 90% of premium income was paid out in claims.

But he said the statistics were skewed by the inclusion of captive insurers who were no longer taking new clients. “They have an ageing client base, with an increasing claims ratio because they are unable to offset that with new business.”

Jonas said other companies tried to undercut the market from time to time and it could take a while for those blocks of business to become profitable.

“It also includes companies whose policy wordings, underwriting quality and/or claims management processes did not, or do not allow them to manage claim ratios effectively.”

He said medical inflation that outpaced general inflation had also been identified as a problem but many treatments were also becoming more effective.

Jonas acknowledged that affordability tended to drop for older age groups, who were more likely to claim.

He said advisers dealing with clients in that position could encourage them to save in their 40s and 50s to cover medical insurance premiums once they retired. Or he said advisers could consider whether a trauma product would offer a better outcome.

Jonas said health insurance might need to change in future so that it targeted only the areas where the public health system did not apply.

He said the New Zealand medical insurance industry was too disjointed to have yet campaigned effectively for measures such as tax breaks for medical insurance policies.

Comments (2)
Craig Knox
Wow now I have heard it all - talk about vested interest. As I understand it Medical Insurance cannot be reinsured away by any underwriter and thus they must pay 100% of claims they accept 'can someone please confirm'. Do we take from the speech that Partners does not have sufficient capital to make medical claim payments and wants its Advisers to sell Trauma instead? Lastly I cannot believe that anyone would recommend Trauma as an alternative to Medical cover as they are vastly different products designed to deal with different things. Cannot wait to see this discussion unfold over the next few days.
0 0
11 years ago

Broker Broker
I agree with observer and congratulate Hayden for making the comment. In many cases (especially where affordability is an issue) a bit of trauma has to be better than nothing and some sort of cover for a major health issue such as cancer etc... All the insurers are struggling with medical so there clearly is an industry issue. Have a look at what cars your medical specialists are driving and that might suggest where some of the money is going. I heard a Tower BDM suggesting to us recently that we should consider recommending medical before anything else - life, income cover, trauma etc...I thought that was a bit out of line...
0 0
11 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.