Insurance

Demand for simpler trauma policies

Monday 19th of January 2015

Premiums have increased as claims soared and insurers face larger tax bills.

Policy definitions have widened, leading to significant claims payouts for trauma and income protection policies. Grandfathering provisions on income tax for life insurers run out at the end of June this year.

“It will be challenging to get premium increases through to cover that tax increase,” Jennings said. “We’ve seen just about every company put rates up over the year, even Partners Life which is not subject to the old rules. The rates are going up because of tax and because of the amount of trauma and income protection claims coming through. It’s not good for the consumer or for us either because we hate putting premium increases through, we always lose quite a few policy-holders who can’t afford it, especially when it comes with age-related increases. We end up with people cancelling policies just when they need them most.”

Advisers could warn their clients that premium increases might be coming, Jennings said.  “For the last 10 years insurers have kept widening and widening benefits and kept increasing medical limits so more people are going through as standard and more are able to make claims.”
He said he could not see the situation changing any time soon.

“Until they get rid of research houses I can’t see insurers pulling back. Companies want to be at the top of research houses’ lists with products and the only way to get there is by widening benefits. I can’t see an end unless we get one of those big losses like have come through in Australia, something that prompts an industry-wide correction.”

In Australia, CBA has so far paid out A$52 million in compensation to clients who received bad advice.

Jennings said companies would offer simple trauma products for those who could not afford the more comprehensive policies “We’ve always had the more stripped-down version but it hasn’t sold well. Advisers want to recommend the policy with full benefits and sell the best product possible. But with prices starting to climb there is demand coming in for simpler trauma products.”

Comments (2)
Ken Maclaren
20 years ago when living in the UK I had an excellent accident policy. For 15 pounds a month my wife and myself had up to 2 million pounds of cover in the event that we ended up permanently in a wheelchair. The policy had various cover levels for less life changing accidents. I viewed it as cover that was there for a disaster, not cover for a problem. As we were both into cycling and mountain biking I viewed it as good value. The only exclusion was non commercial air sports. Nothing approaching that has been available since we moved to NZ.
0 0
9 years ago

ian whitehead
The Lifecare product that Fidelity offer is a good way around the problem. I think a lot of people do not understand it. Appreciate your comment Milton.
0 0
9 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.