Insurance

Gannon talks leads, not leaks

Saturday 7th of January 2012

Gannon was speaking to Good Returns in the wake of a story in the Sunday Star Times citing a ‘leaked’ email he sent to advisers which, the story claimed, suggested commissions influence insurance advice. 

“It wasn’t a leaked email, it was an email I sent out to the market, for a start, so not leaked,” he said.

“My email was quite clear saying to people there is a new insurance company [Partners Life] in the marketplace and its really, really important for the good of the industry, the good of agency agreements, the good of everybody that people do what’s right for their clients first and foremost, but you need to be responsible and you need to do what you can to maintain your retention rates.”

He said the point of the email – to safeguard persistency – “is not a new thing.”

“I’ve been in the business 27 years and the industry has always had persistency criteria in agency agreements, there is nothing new that I can see being brought into the market that hasn’t been around since day dot.”

In the email Gannon urged advisers to maintain their OnePath retention rates, saying “all advisers must spend time on the retention of business sold as this going forward will become more and more important, not only with OnePath but all carriers.”

Gannon said the message in the email was simple.

“Hang in there, work hard, keep your retention rates up there, it’s good for everybody, it’s good for the industry, don’t do anything silly in the short term to jeopardise that.”

He said he was disappointed that the story distracted from the success of a leads programme Newpark had undertaken this year.

“We’ve generated 8,000 brand new leads for advisers in the market this year, we thought that was a pretty positive story,” he said.

“That has transformed into our group being up 42% on written API for this year – that is massive," he says.

Comments (4)
Craig Knox
Could the author of this article confirm that when Darren states “That has transformed into our group being up 42% on written API for this year – that is massive," that the 42% increase excludes the churn within Newpark from companies like OnePath to Partners Life. To make this claim post the statement they have "generated 8,000 brand new leads for advisers in the market this year, we thought that was a pretty positive story,” is misleading without the churn removed. I suspect this growth is significantly enhanced from churn and that this churn is the real story not the leads.
0 0
12 years ago

Craig Knox
I agree 100% with amused in regards the clients best interests MUST drive everything. That said it’s reasonable to question,analyse and understand what’s going on here given the scale of the churn tone to primarily one underwriter from one dealer group who have historically done this with other providers. This issue does not just affect Newpark brokers, their clients and Partner Life. This is an industry issue as what happens here shapes competitive and regulatory response and ultimately consumer behaviour & trust of our industry. Your comments mask the financial benefit advisors receive for moving their clients. Price is a great reason for a client to move but claims history is more important as a Life Policy is about ‘certainty of claim’ at point of need. Partners has no history and I would have thought when moving clients with medical or other complications then claims history would rank higher than price.
0 0
12 years ago

Craig Knox
Broker give us some details of the statement you make as I have no problems with the history of the firms I use.
0 0
12 years ago

Kerry Otto
I have just received two anniversary notices for a client from one company, that informs him that his monthly premium (rate for age) will go from $899/month to $1110/month for life trauma, TPD and Income benefits (he is not a happy camper and understandably so). This was for a 57 year old non-smoker, class one client. The same cover with six of my nine insurance companies all come in better priced than this (some marginally) and one is over $300 per month cheaper and with enhanced benefits (some can't offer cover due to maximum entry age) I will always do the right thing for my client, so I have informed him today of his options. Here is the dilemma: 1) If I take him to the least expensive better benefits insurance company, that is called "churning". 2) If another adviser does the same that is called "good business". Do I wait around for another adviser to do "the right thing for my client" and loose the business, or do I risk the "wrath" of an insurance provider who says I am a "churner". I know where I am and that is for the good of the client and have an appointment with him on Monday to complete an application form. Regarding claims history; All insurance companies started out with no claims history and that did not stop them cementing their name in the market place. At the end of the day the client rules, but he bases his decision on what he needs with education, knowledge and understanding.
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.