Insurance

Pinnacle Life gets a rating

Monday 16th of July 2012

The rating agency has assigned a financial strength rating of B (Fair) and an issuer credit rating of "bb+" to The Pinnacle Life Insurance Partnership. The outlook assigned to both ratings is stable.

The assigned ratings reflect Pinnacle's direct distribution capabilities, comparatively low lapse ratios and favorable reinsurance arrangements, AM Best says.

Pinnacle mainly underwrites simple life insurance in the no-frills term life segment of the New Zealand market, relying primarily on direct distribution.

The company's direct distribution capabilities have been enhanced by its online underwriting platform, which generated the majority of its new policies in the past five years. Growing at around 21% annually, Pinnacle's gross written premiums outpaced the market in the five years to March 31, 2012 (according to unaudited accounts).

Pinnacle has established a niche in its targeted market segment. This is reflected in its lapse ratio, which has been maintained below the market average.

Pinnacle's risk-adjusted capitalisation and net benefits to net premiums written ratio are significantly supported by its reinsurance arrangements. These significantly reduce retained underwriting risk and contribute to keeping its net claims at a low and stable level.

Offsetting rating factors include Pinnacle's high expense ratio and the high proportion of net policy assets on its balance sheet.

"Direct distribution expenses, such as advertising, have been considerable," AM Best says. "Pinnacle's expense ratio exceeded 100% over the past five years. Management is aware of the need to control expenses."

The ratings agency says as a large proportion of the company's expenses are related to advertising.  It anticipates that Pinnacle will have the ability to reduce its expenses going forward.

Net life policy assets and movements have accounted for the majority of Pinnacle's reported earnings and net assets (89% of net assets as of March 31, 2012 according to unaudited accounts).

"This is a strain on its risk-adjusted capitalisation as the value of net life policy assets depends on retaining inforce policies. Management is contemplating raising capital from new investors. This could, potentially, significantly strengthen Pinnacle's risk-adjusted capitalisation by reducing net life policy assets relative to reported capital."

AM Best plans to review Pinnacle's ratings after the completion of the planned capital injection.

"A substantial reduction in the proportion of Pinnacle's net life policy assets to reported capital could lead to upward rating actions. However, a negative deviation to the company's forecast adjusted policyholder surplus could lead to downward movement on the ratings."

Comments (5)
James Sheridan
Now there used to be an insurer that had an A+ credit rating. It's name is AMI and it has needed a Government bailout and suffered credit downgrades since. The reason is due to re-insurance. Please note that the re-insurers cover the risk in some and not others. This is what I look for.
0 0
12 years ago

Brent Lewis
I seem to remember the likes of AMP and National Mutual laughing at this silly little company called Sovereign just over 20 years ago, I don't see them laughing now. Or who would have thought Club Life would ever amount to much? From what I can see, anything Naomi Ballantyne or Chris Coon is involved with turns to gold.
0 0
12 years ago

Mike King
You must be joking!!!"you must be joking". From which ancient & venerable AAA institution do you hail? Guardian? MLC? Colonial? Prudential? NZI?????
0 0
12 years ago

Steve Wright
I can see "You must be joking" in front of a distraught client, the discussion will go something like this... "Mrs Client I'm sorry but your health insurer doesn't cover your $65,000 chemotherapy bill not funded by PHARMAC" "but Mr Adviser we've paid premiums all this time to protect us where the public health system could not, on your advice!" "Mrs client take comfort, your insurance company has an A rating" "Mr Adviser, who is your DRS?" highestdprovider
0 0
12 years ago

Steve Wright
Hi Billythebroker Neither of the two health insurance companies that provide the most comprehensive cover for non-pharmac drugs has an A rating. One has a B++ (AM Best)and the other is not yet rated, so the implication is that any current A rated company does not cover non-pharmac funded drugs optimally or at all.
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.