News

IRD quietly raises changes to depreciation

Tuesday 12th of January 2010

Inland Revenue released a discussion document last year outlining its latest views on how investors should treat depreciation.

Although a press release was put out in November very few people were aware of either its existence or the dicussion document.

When IRD raised this issue three years ago there was signifcant opposition to the proposed changes.

The IRD acknowledges its "Residential Rental Properties - Depreciation of items of depreciable property" had previously been released for comment and, "in response to earlier submissions, has been amended and released again for further public consultation".

The IRD set a December 18 date for submissions, however it is unclear how many submissions were made as many investors were unaware of the document.

According to IRD, "the most significant change is the development of a three-step test that will be applied to determine whether an item should be treated separately or as part of the building".

That is, investors need to determine whether an item is:

  1. attached or connected to the building
  2. is an integral part of the building
  3. if removed, what damage could be caused.

Its draft statement also includes an appendix with common items, such as plumbing, electrical wiring, hot water cylinders, doors, and cupboards, and states whether these are viewed as separately depreciable items or part of the building.

Comments (2)
Andy McDougall
and fair enough - plumbing, electrical wiring, hot water cylinders, doors, cupboards, letterboxs - HELLO were does it stop shall we claim for the nails as well ...............
0 0
14 years ago

Alistair Gillespie
Depreciation is a provision to replace the expired part of an asset and in a property used for long term residential rental items such as kitchen units, letter boxes baths etc do need to be replaced there fore should be depreciable. I would accept that interior walls in a residential rental may not wear very fast over the useful life but in a commercial building interior walls are likely to have a shorter lifetime so again it should be acceoted that they are depreciated though at different rates. You could argue that things like electrical reticulation and plumbing do need to be replaced over time and they to should be depreciable but have the same depreciation test as to whether it is a commercial or residential lease. If a building is subsequently sold the depreciation is sorted through the "depreciation claw-back" regime.
0 0
14 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.