News

Adviser career path needed

Tuesday 22nd of December 2015

New research from Cerulli Associates shows the US adviser head count has increased year-on-year for the first time in nine years, by 1.1%.

"Many positive developments led to the headcount growth last year," said Kenton Shirk, associate director at Cerulli.

"From the adviser perspective, there is a heavier focus on teaming and onboarding rookie advisers into multi-adviser practices. Advisers are eager to hire junior advisers so they can refocus their own efforts on their largest and most ideal clients. There is also greater awareness and concern about succession preparedness."

But the firm predicts numbers will start to fall again by 2019 as more advisers retire.

In New Zealand, the number of advisers has been steadily dropping since the advent of regulation.

In June last year, there were about 1900 AFAs operating in New Zealand.

Over the year to September, 91 new advisers were authorised and 122 terminated their authorisations. There are now 1842 AFAs.

Terminations include people who have let their FSPR registrations slide or voluntarily removed themselves and terminated their licenses.

Massey University financial services commentator Claire Matthews said financial advice needed to become an attractive career option, “particularly for young people coming in”.

She said it was very hard for young people to start out as advisers. “There needs to be an apprenticeship model.”

Institute of Financial Advisers president Michael Dowling agreed. He said there was no clear career path for advisers. “Do you go from a qualifying financial entity adviser to a registered financial adviser to an authorised financial adviser?”

He said a clearer track would make it easier to appeal to young people studying at university. It was something the FMA had acknowledged in discussions about the FAA review options paper.

Attracting the right people to become advisers was vital, he said.

Comments (1)
Natasha Silvestri
Michael Dowling's reported speculation about a career path, QFE - RFA - AFA is irrelevant and only compounds confusion. A QFE adviser could be much more experienced and skilled than a RFA or AFA, just as an RFA could be much more skilled than an AFA. Any career path must surely be dictated by the advisers chosen discipline/type of advice given, namely, insurance (F&G or Life) investments, financial, retirement planning etc As an aside, it is unfortunate the IFA appears to consider AFA status as superior (when in fact it is largely irrelevant for mortgage broking and insurance advice). Perhaps this is why they have so few members these days.
0 0
8 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.