News

Cowboy wrangle continues

Friday 8th of July 2011

NZMBA chief Darren Pratley said that while he was shown the advert before launch, it was made clear that this was not a collaborative process and no changes would be made.

"What happened was I'm sitting in a room at the FMA office and I was given a piece of paper which had an image of the new advertising on it. I looked at it and went - I think we should make a few changes," Pratley said.

"I was told no. We can't make any changes. That's what's going out, I just thought you should know."

Pratley was eager to set the record straight after reader comments to the original Good Returns story suggested some advisers believed the advert had the NZMBA's blessing.

"There is no way in the world that we were consulted, there is no way in the world I am overly comfortable with the image they used," he said.

"I accept that they had to come up with a campaign but there was actually no consultation, there was no ‘guys, we need to get the message across, what do you think?'"

IFA chief executive Peter Lee took a neutral stance on the advert, saying "it's something that's purely up to the FMA to decide how it wants to communicate".

The IFA president Nigel Tate was less forgiving.

"I personally, as a practitioner, find it offensive and it's not a good way to build a collaborative relationship with the industry, especially when you're the new kid on the block."

"We've had 20 years of change in our profession, we've had 20 years of evolution and 99% of the rogues and the cowboys that may well have roamed the prairie have gone," he said.

Despite their disapproval of the advert, both Pratley and Tate stressed their commitment to working with the regulator.

"There are people in the industry that actually support the direction we're going in and we actually want to make this a supportive, constructive change to get the consumer better advice," Pratley said.

Tate also said it wasn't his wish to bash the FMA over the issue.

"It is my desire however to maintain the relationship we've developed with the FMA over the last five years or so, with the Securities Commission as it was, we want to maintain that and we don't want this sort of thing to break down the level of trust that we've had."

"It's not a good start. I'm hoping that things will improve from here, we can get past it," he said.

BLOG: Your advice (on FMA ads) please

Comments (5)
alan milton
It seems to me that what the FMA lacks is a person who understands what decent PR is all about
0 0
13 years ago

Clayton Coplestone
The IFA is a voluntary subscription, whereas the Regulator is not. If the IFA wishes to attract & retain membership, it will need to take a view on a range of industry sensitive issues – including this one. Lobbying, providing a collective voice and standing up for its members must be part of the IFA’s value proposition – otherwise I’m at a loss to understand its purpose.
0 0
13 years ago

Benn Bathgate
In response to Broken Record's comment Darren Pratley did say he was shown the material under an embargo preventing any discussion ahead of the adverts release. Apologies for any confusion that omission from the story has caused.
0 0
13 years ago

Daryl McAlinden
The FMA had an embargo on a (derogatory) advertisement? I can undestand an embargo on a press release or a major announcement, but for an advertisement! Just demonstrates the arrogance of the FMA and implied disrespect to the IFA.
0 0
13 years ago

Simon Rule
Let’s not forget it wasn't so long ago that Pratley and his chums at the NZMBA were pushing for all mortgage brokers to be authorised (AFA). This desire had nothing to do with improving standards amongst brokers, it was aimed solely at the association's own survival by giving it a training role to play in the new regulatory environment post 1st July. Given that the vast majority of mortgage brokers are Registered Financial Advisers and DO NOT need to belong to a professional body to demonstrate ongoing competency (section 37 of the FA Act states that ONLY an authorised financial adviser must comply with the Code of Professional Conduct) one has to seriously question the “value for money” of NZMBA membership going forward. Mortgage Link clearly have made this conclusion already by saying to its members now that NZMBA membership is only “optional”
0 0
13 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.