News

Financial complaints system has fundamental flaw: FDR

Friday 23rd of September 2011

That's the view of Financial Disputes Resolution (DRS) chief Stuart Ayres.

"There's a fundamental flaw in it really as we can't measure systematic issues and we can't measure consumer satisfaction - therefore consumer confidence - which is the underpinning thing in all this," he said.

Ayres said he had made a submission to the Ministry of Consumer Affairs (MCA) but has yet to receive a reply.

"I think it's a good idea to have a central clearing area, to what extent they'll [the MCA] do it, put in place a system where they can record and monitor, is to be seen. I'm not sure they want to go that far just yet but I would strongly recommend they do, so we can record systematic issues and gauge customer satisfaction."

Ayres also acknowledged that to work, such a clearing system would require cooperation from the other disputes resolution schemes.

He also said the lack of a complaints culture in New Zealand was reflected in the attitude of companies across the board.

"We don't have a complaints type culture in New Zealand, not just in finance but any organisation, you'll find they will not promote and make customers aware they have a complaints process."

He also argued businesses could actually benefit from a more open and transparent complaints system.

"Put it on your website and all advertising material, promote it to your customers and invite feedback, ultimately this will benefit you, having your customers telling you what you can do better."

Comments (9)
Simon Rule
Sorry Stuart, this just sounds like a pitch for customers to complain about (something) so that the DRS's can actually have work to do! Since the 1st July I'd be really interested to see the number of advisers across the country that have actually had to use their DRS to sort out a complaint from a client. Even with clients now been made fully aware of the options available to them if they have an issue with an adviser's service we have not seen the flood gates open with complaints have we? Most advisers in the industry are doing the right thing by their clients and as a consequence will never have a complaint to deal with in the first place. End of story.
0 0
13 years ago

W K
@amused: Is that what you call "job creation" or "cutting the dole queue"?
0 0
13 years ago

Simon Rule
@ w k: ??? Seems to me employing people in a central call centre to take complaints from customers and then passing them on to the appropriate DSR is redundant. Firstly adviser's disclosure statements clearly have to spell out which DSR the adviser in question belongs to (well at least mine does) and secondly how many complaints to DSR's are actually been lodged every week at present to begin with? This just smells of an agenda been pushed here and guess who will end up paying for it in the end. Surely the fact that so few complaints have been lodged against advisers is a good sign? Well clearly not according to Stuart & Trevor and it doesn’t take a genius to figure out why... Resourcing the FMA better than it currently is seems to be where the priority should be when talking about new jobs.
0 0
13 years ago

Phil Menzies
How long can you run a company that has nothing to do...unless you go out and create the work.My guess. There will only be one Disputes Company in 5 years time.
0 0
13 years ago

Simon Rule
Well said PM. Trevor you've confirmed that complaint numbers against advisers to date have been low and let us all hope that continues to be the case. As far as FSCL is concerned would you be kind enough to share with us just how many complaints have actually needed to be referred through to your attention? As you state it is your preference to see the adviser and the client resolve a complaint via their internal process without referral to FSCL. I'm sure many advisers would be interested in knowing how many cases you have had to actually deal with since the 1st July.
0 0
13 years ago

Stuart Ayres
I can assure readers that Mr Bathgate initiated this interview and we are not attempting to drum up business. On the contrary,as it would seem with Fscl,we actively promote Best Practice Complaints Management to avoid disputes (coming through to DRS) and enhance customer satisfaction and new business opportunities (to a something they would rather keep under the table. advisers/ financial service providers).These are practices ingrained in world class businesses (eg Toyota) but rarely in New Zealand. What a wonderful opportunity for advisers to make a valuable point of difference to financial consumers out of what many unfortunately would rather keep under the table. Internal complaints procedures and DRS are here to stay. Make the most of the resources at your DRS and convert them to $ in your business.
0 0
13 years ago

Simon Rule
Sorry Stuart you'll pardon me if I take that last statement of yours with a grain of salt. Given the nature of how your business functions it makes sense for you to encourage as many complaints as possible. This is especially true when to date so few complaints have been received by DRS's (see Trevor's last post) The reality is that the majority of advisers operating in the industry are and always will operate ethically when dealing with their clients hence a complaint is never going to eventuate in the first place. Whilst now a requirement of law the internal complaints procedure and DRS is for the majority of advisers just another cost (albeit small) on their businesses. When it comes to regulation I for one am getting a little bit sick and tired of people trying to feather their own nests!
0 0
13 years ago

W K
@amused. my apologies, i didn't phrase the question clearly. what i meant was consumers are encouraged to lodge complaints for whatever reasons so that some people don't have to be on the dole at advisors' expense.
0 0
13 years ago

Simon Rule
@ w k. No worries :)
0 0
13 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.