News

Government questions RFAs' professionalism

Tuesday 29th of January 2013

Financial adviser groups are preparing for a series of meetings with the Ministry.

Its consultation document also asks what weight should be put on aligning New Zealand with Australia’s Future of Financial Advice reforms, as well as what advisers think of UK moves to ban commission, whether the public values Registered Financial Advisers’ disclosure documents and whether there would be value in expanding them to cover remuneration.


Other areas outlined as being for stakeholder discussion include whether the 2011 Act has improved professionalism in the industry, what impact it has had on the low-to-mid end of investment advice, whether the “good character” tests done by the FMA go far enough, and  whether conflict of interest disclosure is adequate and whether the QFE scheme is working well.


Financial Services Council chairman Peter Neilson said the discussion points were first circulated about a fortnight ago. He is in the process of organising a response and will meet the Ministry tomorrow. He would not give any further details until his organisation’s response was finalised.


Institute of Financial Advisers chairman Nigel Tate said his organisation had booked a meeting with the Ministry. He and chief executive Penny Mudford would work on what response the organisation would offer.

Comments (10)
Graeme Tee
Why don't they try "insurance salesman" seeing that what most RFAs do?
0 0
11 years ago

Broker Broker
I'd be happy with that.
0 0
11 years ago

W K
i don't see anything wrong with that title.
0 0
11 years ago

Brent Lewis
Being an insurance salesman is something to be proud of,however many think a fancy title will help raise their self worth. Pity that.
0 0
11 years ago

GRANT MOTION
Given the recent appalling history of AFAs the more insurance salesman can distance themselves from that so called qualification and redefine their FMA status the better.
0 0
11 years ago

Andy Phillipson
But I also do budget and mortgage advice... I used to be a financial consultant, then a mortgage broker. Then the law made me drop both of those and become an RFA. At the end of the day, it doesn't make a lick of difference to my clients/customers/followers/people... Rather than trying to change names and titles, why not make sure the advice and qualifications we have are appropriate to the clients we have! THERE'S a new concept!
0 0
11 years ago

Graeme Tee
Given the majority of comments above, it will be interesting to see what the IFA come up with? I believe they had something to do with the whole AFA/RFA definition in the first place.
0 0
11 years ago

Simon Rule
Well said John Honest. Parasitic is a very accurate description indeed!
0 0
11 years ago

Broker Broker
Graeme I am also tertiary qualified, corporate background blah blah blah but at the end of day sell insurance cover and am proud of it - no need to hide behind fancy titles. Maybe car salesmen should be renamed RTC's - registered transportation consultants? Fun debate anyway...
0 0
11 years ago

Broker Broker
Do you talk people out of buying insurance? Give them a 50 page report and leave it with them to never make a decision?
0 0
11 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.