News

Greens say they can lower KiwiSaver fees 40%

Sunday 6th of November 2011

Its so-called ‘public option' provider would use the NZ Superannuation Fund's Guardians as its investment manager and have either Inland Revenue or Kiwibank as the administration manager.

Green Party Co-leader Russel Norman says "a significant part of New Zealanders' savings get eaten away by costs and fees."

He says "the current costs and fees faced by KiwiSavers are prohibitively high reducing the incentives to join and eroding the value of KiwiSavers' nest eggs at retirement."

He argues this new option, would "lower costs sizably, saving tens of thousands of dollars," said today.

"If these savings are reinvested, KiwiSavers' nest eggs will be significantly higher, up to $142,000 higher in some cases ($64,000 in today's dollars).

"We will do for superannuation, what Kiwibank has done for banking. We will ensure there is a value for money public option.

He says significant fee and cost reductions would come through greater economies of scale.

"The Super Fund is the only purpose-built superannuation fund that's big enough to secure wholesale cost savings. The Guardians manage a $16 billion fund compared with

the $2.9 billion of assets managed by the six current default providers."

While the Greens talked of a seventh default provider Norman also referred, in his press statement yesterday, to having a single large default provider.

Full details of the policy are not yet available however there is a Q&A document here.

Comments (4)
Daryl McAlinden
Just another smoke screen by this far left political party for Government control of private savings. Next on their agenda will be the fund purchasing majority holdings in New Companies for defacto nationalisation of private enterprise.
0 0
13 years ago

alan milton
would the Greens put constraints on what the manager could invest in?
0 0
13 years ago

Richard James
While the idea of the Super Fund being the only default provider is inherently sensible the current political and public obsession with Kiwisaver fees is a red herring. KS investment management fees are low by any standards. Total costs just appear high at present because member balances are still relatively small and the administrative costs are too high. Both of those factors will normalise over time. But the greatest cost to KS investors will come in the form of their own behaviours. If we look at the international precedents (see the DALBAR studies) then it is clear that investor decision making costs investors 3-5% per annum over the long run relative to the performance of the funds/markets in which they are invested. That is a cost many times greater than the fee issue currently being debated. Ameliorating that behavioural cost should be where the debate is focused, and neither the Super Fund nor the Greens have an understanding or capability in that regard.
0 0
13 years ago

Phil Menzies
Surely the Greens primary focus should be on 'saving' the planet. Controlling the affects of earthquakes, volcanoes and the flow of wind, rain and the clouds. Then and only then should they delve into anything financial assuming the planet still exists.
0 0
13 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.