News

IFA worried by TNP's new acronyms

Tuesday 21st of February 2012

However, TNP said the new designations would not be in direct competition with other acronyms offered by the likes of the IFA.  

The dealer group has brought in three new designations as part of the launch of its own professional association, TNPPA.

According to the media release, TNPPA Certified is "predominantly a business practice designation that recognises business practice standards, educational standards and professional tenure."

Associate Risk Adviser is an "education-based designation [that] has been developed specifically for RFAs who have completed the Certificate in Financial Services in order to recognise their educational achievement and professional tenure."

The Chartered Risk Adviser designation "recognises educational achievement at a diploma level."

IFA chairman Tony Vidler said the institute held a "neutral" view on TNP's decision to enter the professional association market but was concerned about the prospect of new designations.

"It has the potential to be confusing for consumers," he said.  "There are already too many acronyms; there's been a proliferation of acronyms and it needs to be tidied up."

Vidler said the IFA, which awards the CFP (Certified Financial Planner) and CLU (Chartered Life Underwriter) designations in New Zealand, had been raising the issue for a long time.

"We've been in that space for over 15 years and to be honest we've talked about it and explained it a heck of a lot over the years.  The more you look into it, you can see it's really not helpful to go out and have a raft of acronyms."

But TNP director of development Dave McMillan denied the new designations would confuse consumers, saying they covered an area not well-served by any other acronym currently available.

"The first thing is to look at the risk space and say, what alternative do they have?  Not a lot," he said. 

McMillan said there was a gap in the market for risk advisers who didn't want to become AFAs but wanted some sort of recognition for their qualifications.

"This is for risk advisers who want to do something more than the minimum and want to be recognised for it."

He said the designations were introduced at the request of TNP's advisers, most of whom are RFAs.

"From what I understand about 95% of IFA members are AFAs; well, we would be almost the reverse."

Comments (3)
Andy Phillipson
Long-timer and Dirty Harry - Well said. My sentiments exactly. Let's get back to basics: Tell the clients what they need and give them what they ask for. Letters after our names and affiliations mean DIDDLY SQUAT to them.
0 0
12 years ago

Tony Vidler
It is not quite right to suggest that the IFA is "worried" about the launch of a new designation by TNP or anybody else. We do have concerns that the proliferation of acronyms, be they new (or borrowed) designations, new associations, and so forth definitely leads to higher confusion for consumers. That confusion does not benefit any party – neither the consumers or other industry stakeholders, and that does make us question the merit of any proposal for new designations at any time (not just in light of the TNP announcement). We use this same questioning process internally, and have indeed debated the need and appropriateness of professional marks at different times over the years ourselves. If new designations are supported by a robust and formal qualification process that includes mentoring, academic achievement, and a minimum (unblemished) performance period by the aspirant then they have credibility. If they also happen to fulfill a need for consumers by identifying a unique skillset that is not otherwise recognised, then new designations would have merit. If new designations are created to provide the illusion of credibility for the benefit of a single stakeholder, then the designation – or it's purpose - must be questioned. The Institute would contend that the Code encapsulates the intent and requirements of the market authorities in respect to recognizing appropriate professional qualifications, and that position is further supported and justified by the extensive history and professional processes involved in attaining (say) the Certified Financial Planner or Chartered Life Underwriter. It is relevant to also consider that both of those designations carry international significance, with over 140,000 CFP's worldwide and over 110,000 CLU's. Tony Vidler - Chairman, Institute of Financial Advisers
0 0
12 years ago

Simon Rule
I'm in total agreement with Long-timer, Dirty Harry and Andy. Believing that membership of a professional body will see your business suddenly blossom from client recognition is being about as naive as you can get sorry. All this talk of clients only wanting to deal with AFAs going forward is total spin by whatever Govt agency, association or training body has a particular agenda to push this week! Appears to me there is a lot of scare mongering going on from people /organisations with financial interests at stake. TNP forming their own professional association is a clear example of this!
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.