News

KiwiSaver advice ‘isn’t rocket science’

Friday 20th of April 2012

The issue has been raised with the Financial Markets Authority by a Registered Financial Adviser, who spoke with Good Returns on the condition of anonymity.

The adviser thought he had all the required qualifications to become an Authorised Financial Adviser, only to discover that he only met the criteria for becoming a “category two” AFA.

Category two AFAs are unable to provide advice on category one products such as KiwiSaver; in order to advise on KiwiSaver he would have to also complete a paper on ‘portfolio design’.

The adviser, who said many of his clients were on modest incomes, questioned why advisers had to learn portfolio design in order to help people pick a KiwiSaver scheme.

He said he just wanted to be able to advise on KiwiSaver and provide budgeting advice; if clients wanted a full-blown investment plan he would refer them to a financial planner.

“KiwiSaver isn’t rocket science; it’s actually quite simple.   As an RFA I can advise on a million-dollar life insurance policy but I can’t help someone with KiwiSaver; there’s a double-standard there.”

The adviser said before the regulations his business was “about 99% risk, with a little bit of KiwiSaver advice on the side”, but now many of his clients were missing out on KiwiSaver advice altogether, due to being unable to afford the services of an AFA.

“An AFA isn’t going to drive out to South Auckland in the middle of the night to help someone with their KiwiSaver for $40.”

Comments (5)
Clayton Coplestone
Agree with the headline - that Kiwisaver is not rocket science. If an "adviser" is unable/unwilling to qualify to provide financial advice (despite the KiwiSaver amounts appearing minor), then they should stick to their core business.
0 0
12 years ago

Wayne Ross
Clearly you could benefit from further education Anon RFA because your role as an investment adviser is not to pick a KiwiSaver scheme. If you don't understand that best stick with Risk. Just because the current model does not pay for good financial advice does not mean any contributors should have to settle for a poor substitute. Plenty of investors in "simple" finance co debentures will attest to that.
0 0
12 years ago

Wayne Ross
Headmaster I think you will find more than a few advisers who are now classified as RFAs placed their clients into fin co debentures. As did many clients all by themselves without any 'help' from advisers. Regulations at a product level for KiwiSaver will not stop investors losing plenty of wealth through making bad decisions.
0 0
12 years ago

Austin Fisher
I agree with your client scenario, GOLFNUT. People know when they are being "upsold" to because it happens all the time, wherever they go. Lots of people join KiwiSaver at work because it means they don't have to engage with a provider or an adviser directly.
0 0
12 years ago

Austin Fisher
The way I see it, the workplace enroller gets into KS in the same easy way that a retail investor sets up a simple cash deposit account at a bank. And I think that's fine. Over time, they might consider going into aggressive/growth funds but that has to be an individual's informed decision - with or without an Adviser. I think some of the moves to get young people automatically into growth funds early on has theoretical merit - but assumes too readily that the wider public are tolerant of volatility and will universally accept that a -10% return in a growth fund is, at times, completely OK. I don't think we are there yet.
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.