News

KiwiSaver and the c-word

Wednesday 28th of September 2011

KiwiSaver compulsion won’t necessarily benefit advisers and even fund managers are divided as to its benefits.

“I don’t necessarily think it’s going to make any difference, certainly not in terms of the average adviser, because given there’s 1.8 million people already in there, the people who aren’t already in probably aren’t either earning a lot, aren’t interested, have opted out, chosen not to be part of it or don’t understand the message,” he said.

Lee said an increased savings pool – and a wider range of fund options and specialisations – could in the long term benefit advisers, but he saw no adviser advantage to compulsion in the short to medium term.
“Because the nature of the people who aren’t already in there are not exactly the target market of your typical adviser.”
Professional Advisers Association (PAA) chief executive Edward Richards agreed that measures to encourage KiwiSaver take-up were commendable, but that other options existed.

While both Lee and Edwards were unified in their view compulsion wouldn’t necessarily benefit advisers, two KiwiSaver fund managers KiwiSaver Good Returns spoke to had differing views on the issue.

Gareth Morgan Investments chief executive Cathy Magiannis said, “I not sure that we’ve actually gone through the pros and cons, I don’t think we’ve yet debated that process and come up with an overall view.”

She admitted that from a providers point of view, compulsion could result in more business, though from a customer point of view it may not be the best option.

“Savings is very personal, and it’s about the individual wanting to do it, enforcing a way of thinking doesn’t necessarily get the correct end result,” she said.

“Thinking about it from a customer perspective, even as a provider, we’re here to service customers, we don’t want them to be in a scheme they don’t want to be in.”

Tower Investments chief executive Sam Stubbs, however, is an enthusiastic supporter of compulsion, saying Tower had been calling for such a change for a long time.

“It ultimately reflects the economic reality, we’ve got to become a savings culture, KiwiSaver seems to have been a very successful way of achieving that.”

Stubbs also dismissed criticism that KiwiSaver compulsion could divert money from other savings or investment schemes.

“It’s not as if diverting savings means you’re diverting it from something better to something worse, in fact the performance of KiwiSaver funds indicates you’re probably diverting it to something better.”

Comments (3)
Clayton Coplestone
It’s a relatively simple argument: you either spend or save money - with New Zealanders currently having a preference for the latter. Compulsory savings not only delivers positive long term social consequences, it underpins both capital markets and the financial services industry.
0 0
13 years ago

Kevin Kevin
If you think NZers arent saving enough, then the best course of action would be to address the reasons for that preference, wouldnt it? How can it be wise to ignore those reasons in favour of using a blunt tool like compulsion? And forgive me if I am underwhelmed by the protectionist argument that compulsory savings "underpins" the financial services industry.
0 0
13 years ago

Simon Rule
In these difficult financial times when most families are struggling just to meet their day to day living costs making Kiwisaver compulsory seems ill advised. I agree that most people should be saving something every fortnight towards their retirement but the reality is most simply have nothing left over. Taking it out of their pay packet before they can spend it will just see more people having to rely on Working for Families etc which means the whole concept of complusory savings becomes self defeating. It will end up costing the country more than it will save us. We can all debate the reasons for people having an inability to save i.e. poor lifestyle choices etc etc but the reality is that many New Zealanders as a whole need to start showing some person responsibility for a change and stop relying on the Government (taxpayer) every time they have another child they can’t afford. No doubt though some apologist on the left will leap to a person’s defence to have 5 children on a household income of only $45,000 p.a. Sigh... Until we change the mindset of many Kiwi’s towards what are and aren’t good financial choices having compulsion in superannuation will not change/fix anything.
0 0
13 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.