News

Providers need to win back public trust: English

Tuesday 30th of June 2009

While the Retirement Commission had succeeded in attracting partnerships with the private sector and educating the public about financial literacy, companies selling savings and investment products had stuck to their ‘self-interested' ways, Finance Minister Bill English told a seminar in Wellington on Friday.

English said it isn't the government's job to improve the public's understanding of the sector, though he did commit to a twice-yearly meeting with the Retirement Commission's advisory committee to discuss ways to boost New Zealanders' financial literacy.

"Product providers want people to buy their products or agree with their opinion or come to their institution," he told the financial literacy summit in Wellington. Lifting financial literacy will go a long way toward rebuilding trust in the financial sector and encouraging people to engage with it, he said.

Keynote speaker Annamaria Lusardi, a professor of economics at Dartmouth College in the U.S., said the finance sector needs to move away from commission-based advice, which encouraged advisers to sell their more expensive products, rather than what was suitable for their client.

Still, she said, the public didn't rely on financial advisers enough, and that was one of the major causes of the credit crisis in America.

A simple way to improve literacy among the wider public was to reduce the complexity of the products available. If it's difficult for someone with a PhD to get their head around a product, imagine how hard it must be for the average person, she said.

 

Comments (2)
Clayton Coplestone
I'm assuming that Annamaria Lusardi's comments in the article have been taken out of context, as I'm unsure of the link between "improving financial literacy" and the reduction of the complexity of the products available. Philosophically, I believe that such full transparency should be sufficient to relegate the ‘fees versus commission’ discussion into being just a ‘preferred method a billing’ debate. However, we should expect the same outcome as is being implemented in Australian industry, whereby fees only advice is becoming the regulated and sole compensation mechanism to permanently separate the “product choice from the compensation”, and to reinforce professionalism. This is likely to occur in Australia as a result of separate but equivalent agreement between the funds and the financial planning associations and their members (to be introduced next year and enforced by 2012).
0 0
15 years ago

The Editor
Thanks David, We've updated the story. Clayton, The statement wasn't taken out of context, as it was the answer to a fairly direct question. Annamaria's point was that if the products are so difficult as to make experts struggle, by removing the complexity you make it easier for everyone to understand, and was a very simple way to lift literacy and accessibility. I've tweaked the story a touch to make this a littler clearer. Fully agree in regard to following Australia's lead - it's something we kiwis seem to do rather well. Thanks for reading and commenting, Paul.
0 0
15 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.