News

Regulation is an adviser’s friend

Friday 14th of September 2012

Angus Dale-Jones, who was previously director of supervision at the defunct Securities Commission (now the Financial Markets Authority), now sits on the other side of the table as a consultant to the financial services sector.

Part of his job is helping businesses deal with compliance issues and he said people often react to regulation rather than taking a “front foot” approach to it.

“I do a lot of positioning work to help people stay a step ahead of the regulations.  It’s about saying, let’s try and understand what business directives suit us and how can we structure the business in such a way we can operate in the regulated environment?” 

A key point many advisers seem to have missed, Dale-Jones said, is that the regulations not only provide protection for consumers but for those who give the advice as well.

“There are 2000 AFAs but an awful lot of people have deliberately engineered their business to avoid AFA status.  What they don’t seem to have realised is it gives them a protection they are missing outside of AFA status.”

This protection includes have reached a competency level agreed as appropriate and having a professional disciplinary committee to adjudicate on complaints, he said.

“RFAs are saying they’re better off without that but it’s like street fighting; there’s no referee to protect you.  What’s all the energy about avoiding the regulatory space?  Surely it has to offer you advantages.”

Dale-Jones said his client base had been shifting away from advisers and towards the wider financial services sector, reflecting the on-going roll-out of financial regulations including the Financial Markets Conduct Bill.

“The financial services sector is where the regulatory blowtorch is at the moment.”

Comments (10)
Simon Rule
“RFAs are saying they’re better off without that but it’s like street fighting; there’s no referee to protect you. What’s all the energy about avoiding the regulatory space? Surely it has to offer you advantages.” Will we never hear the end of comments like this from people such as Dale-Jones? Frankly RFAs are sick to death of the scaremongering that continues to persist from individuals or organisations that have a vested financial interest in seeing advisers become authorised (AFA) Advisers can see right through the agenda been pushed here!
0 0
12 years ago

Andy Phillipson
I have done the study, as well as a lot of other far more important and relevant study and learning. I cannot see any advantage to me or my clients in actually registering as an AFA. In fact it will cost me significantly more, cost my clients more, drown them in paperwork, drown me in additional legal requirements and paperwork, and waste my time. It will also subject me to greater liability and scrutiny. While the scrutiny doesn't worry me, the cost of a full audit is ridiculous.
0 0
12 years ago

stephen goodmon
What is this guy on? There are NO benefits to being an AFA, only a higher level of compliance, as opposed to my fellow advisers. Avoid at all costs. And yes I am an AFA.
0 0
12 years ago

Brent Sheather
I had to waste upwards of 200 hrs of my life..significant when yr my age..to do the exams to become an AFA and what did i learn..nothing..has it changed my recommendations to clients..not one bit..is CPD a ridiculous nuisance,waste of time and money..absolutely..anyone interested in paying me what Carmel paid Huljich should ring immediately ..lol
0 0
12 years ago

Simon Rule
I can't help wondering if the only people gaining any real benefit from AFA status are the compliance people (like Angus Dale-Jones) and the regulators themselves? Please don’t tell me that regulation has spawned yet another “shadow industry” of compliance experts and training organisations whose focus is on growing their own businesses at the expense of the industry they are supposed to be working to improve.
0 0
12 years ago

Clayton Coplestone
I'm not sure what the fuss is about: if you want to play, then you've got to join the club.
0 0
12 years ago

Mike King
Like many others, I have met the requirements to register as an AFA (including investment papers) but have elected to NOT be involved in investment advice subsequent to the changes last year, I find Angus-Jones comments to be just short of downright insulting. The imitation he makes is (supported by Voluntary AFA) that I cannot be providing an advice service pf sufficient quality unless I line up to pay significantly more than I currently do, bent over for a butt-smacking from time to time (or, more accurately, be forced to operate/work/LIVE in a culture of fear, and - most insulting of all - pay for the privilege! What?????????? I don't know Mr Dale-Jones personal back story, but i do know he has (recently) come from a comfortable salaried position funded by the taxpayer. I may be wrong in this assumption but I think it is a fair surmise. So, I hope he is successful in navigating his new regulated professional ocean, but his view is, in my view, worth less than mine because I - like many others In this business - have been operating on a basis that the recent regulation has only finally caught up with (!) - I have been putting ALL my advice in writing since 1994, and these new rules are no ore than a definition & refinement of what I've been doing anyway. Bring on the FMA! As an RFA I have confidence in my advice process (and know it is light years ahead of that of several AFAs whose work I have been invited to review.
0 0
12 years ago

Three cents worth
Brent: The Exams weren't there to teach experienced advisers (Which I presume you are as that is what you promote yourself as) anything, they were there to prove MINIMUM standards for those wishing to meet the basic requirements of Authorisation. Should it have changed your recommendations to clients? No, not unless you were giving advice outside normal minimum standards as set by the regulator. Is CPD a waste of time and money? No, it is an integral part of being a professional and the key is to be able to identify what you don't know or need to keep updated on, and go do it. But that must be really hard in your position as you already know everything.
0 0
12 years ago

Brent Sheather
Hi Bazza,I accept that your rationale for CPD is correct in theory anyway however I have had already incurred about $3000 in fees and associated travel costs for 2 CPD courses and they were,to put it mildly,worse than useless. So if you or anyone else are aware of any cpd that will actually benefit my clients I would love to hear about it and I'm not interested in courses that help in marketing.
0 0
12 years ago

Brent Sheather
yeah well..despite asking lots of people where I can do some worthwhile CPD I still find myself humming that u2 song "still haven't found what I'm looking for"
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.