| Log In Subscribe for $0.99/week
2
2 Comment
Save Story
News

Ross pleads guilty

Thursday 29th of August 2013

A joint agency investigation between SFO and FMA into Ross Asset Management (RAM), and related entities, led the SFO to charge Ross on June 13.

The charges were four counts of false accounting and one count of theft by person in special relationship.

Then FMA charged Ross with one count of providing a financial service when he was not registered for that service, one count of knowingly making a false or misleading declaration or representation to FMA for the purposes of obtaining authorisation to become an AFA, and one count of supplying information or producing documents to FMA which he knew to be false or misleading.

The investigation into RAM and its related entities commenced in October last year when FMA received complaints from investors who had been unable to withdraw funds. FMA took immediate action to preserve investors’ funds by obtaining asset preservation orders and appointing receivers and managers to RAM and its related entities. A joint investigation with SFO subsequently commenced. 

The SFO charges alleged that Ross conducted a Ponzi scheme which he disguised by falsely reporting clients’ investments. Large portions of client portfolios shown as invested through a broker "Bevis Marks" were fictitious and never existed, resulting in an overstatement of investment positions by more than $380 million.

More than 1,200 RAM client accounts have been affected by Ross’ scheme.

SFO acting chief executive Simon McArley said: “While a guilty plea does not address the significant losses incurred by a large number of victims, it will bring some relief to those victims. SFO and FMA have worked well together, applying their respective specialist skills in order to progress the investigation quickly and enable this timely outcome.”

FMA Head of Enforcement, Belinda Moffat said: “The financial adviser regime relies on advisers providing truthful information when they apply for any licence and Ross’ conduct has seriously undermined the integrity of that regime. We are committed to restoring investor confidence and will continue to respond immediately to investor complaints against market participants.”

Ross has been remanded in custody to reappear on 24 October to set a sentencing date.

Comments (2)
David Whyte
Fair comment Barry. The FMA, advisers, and consumers have been poorly served by legislation that hasn't achieved its objectives. As a chartered accountant, Ross failed to meet the professional body's standards, yet this was not picked up until after the event, if at all. The perception that the FMA is somehow responsible, is, as you say, inappropriate. However, they sometimes don't help themselves by apparently exceeding their remit in attempting to re-write and re-interpret the Code of Practice and ignoring the legislative/regulatory framework laid down. I understood the FMA were, among other duties, the body entrusted with supervising adherence to the Code of Conduct by those subject to the Code provisions. Setting the standards contained in the Code was - again please correct me if I'm wrong - the responsibility of the Code Committee. So if they seem to extend their authority over matters apparently beyond their remit, it's understandable that some might choose to allocate blame - however incorrect this may be.
0 0
11 years ago
Brent Sheather
From memory accountants didn't have to complete Standard Set C which,again from memory, is designed to show that you can practically give sensible investment advice. This might have highlighted a problem. The Code Committee gave accountants this exemption and also gave lots of other groups with chequered histories the same exemption. That's where the blame lies and that's what needs to be fixed, amongst lots of other things. We need to replace some members of the Code Committee with people with some knowledge of best practice.
0 0
11 years ago
Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.
Next Article
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
No plain sailing around Castle Point
No plain sailing around Castle Point
3 min read
Latest News
The run of play is towards more and more underwriting, and not just at the traditional new business stage
The run of play is towards more and more underwriting, and not just at the traditional new business stage
3 min read
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
NZ sharemarket starts week up 0.6%
NZ sharemarket starts week up 0.6%
4 min read
Can Games Teach Financial Literacy?
Can Games Teach Financial Literacy?
4 min read
News
More Read
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
No plain sailing around Castle Point
No plain sailing around Castle Point
3 min read
Failure to plan for data-hungry AI will have consequences
Failure to plan for data-hungry AI will have consequences
3 min read
NZ Super Fund terminates Devon mandate
NZ Super Fund terminates Devon mandate
1 min read
Latest Comments
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
As much as I disapprove of the ASB stance, I totally understand it, ESPECIALLY as the ComCom expect us to put an application to 4-5 banks, and not just the one we believe to suit the client the best. By demanding this, we would be tying the banks up with 4-5 times the applications necessary to secure a settlement. Banks would know that only 20-25% of applications are going to make it through to settlement. This shotgun approach is why banks are overloaded.
1 month ago Andy Phillipson
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
This is pure BS from the major banks. In front of ComCom earlier in the year they denied any policy of channel inequality yet there clearly is from some (at board level) both in turnaround times and cashbacks for example. They need to staff up, sort their antiquated IT and give Advisers the respect they deserve. New Zealand borrowers are voting with their feet and using Advisers more and more. Are some banks starting their pushback? One as done it before so no surprise there.
2 months ago Jeff Royle
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
As a financial adviser, business owner and ex-banker/home lender in NZ & Australia with almost 20 years experience I can tell you that this is very concerning for several reasons - first one being that as bank staff you still get paid regardless of whether you put the approval thru, lazy/incompetent/time poor bankers are often declining loans rather than taking the time to push a difficult deal thru as they get paid either way, as a financial adviser who doesn't get paid unless the deal settles we are more committed to securing an approval which is why more volume now comes thru the broker channels. This feels like it's the banks way of reducing costs by not having to pay brokerage to advisers when bank lenders doing nothing should be sitting on the broker overflow lines. This directly affects small businesses and is another example of banks playing God & redirecting profit margins back to their own coffers - there is no valid excuse for branch lenders doing nothing to not be sitting on these overflow lines. It makes a mockery of giving the choice back to the clients who are already typically having poor banking experiences when dealing direct with bank staff.l and in no way supports small businesses already doing it tough.
2 months ago Natasha Viliamu
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
Another major bank today has announced no pre approvals via Advisers for under 80% LVR. That's at least 3 of them. All applications whether direct or through Advisers should be given the same priority and go through the same assessment process. Banks don't appear to have invested (enough) in staff or technology and given how much money they make, it is unacceptable. Lets hope it gets sorted soon!
2 months ago Craig Pope
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
Sorry I don’t believe ASB are overrun with applications as we are traditional in a slow market so I think this” high volume “ excuse is rubbish, ASB will still post a massive profit due margins being so high but they can’t hire extra staff?? This is a disgrace! for consumers that choose to go through an independent mortgage adviser ASB are turning them away, but an ASB branch can write that deal no problem? , what happened to offering choice to the consumer? And being competitive? Are Comcom silent on this? Are the dealer groups /master FAP’s who have a monopoly over mortgage advisers’ access to bank mortgage lending silent on this? Why do we pay dealer groups /Master FAPs thousands in fees and costs if they can’t or don’t want to even back the people that pay their wages. All mortgage advisers want is an even playing field no more no less. How would ASB feel if all mortgage advisers in NZ stopped sending business to them for a few months?
2 months ago Valkyrie Vulcan