News

[Weekly Wrap] A week of surprises

Friday 15th of August 2014

I have to say I was surprised to hear the FMA say that after three years of regulation advisers still aren't up to scratch. Advisers have been working bloody hard, at the detriment to their day-to-day business, of doing the ever-increasing list of chores the regulator throws at them.

Then to make such a broad statement, which implies it's everyone who needs to lift their game isn't something which comes out of the How to Win and Influence Advisers playbook.

As I have noted before after three years of regulation there is very little evidence to suggest advisers are doing a bad job - just look at how little the Financial Advisers Disciplinary Committee has had to do.

We did ask the FMA for an interview to discuss these comments, however that request was turned down.

My message to advisers is keep up the good work and helping your clients.

The other comments which came from the speech were about banks and their KiwiSaver selling practices.  This is another surprise that nothing has happened here. At Good Returns we have reported and editorialised on the issue many times over the years. It is one topic I have seen advisers really get worked up over during FMA presentations at conferences, yet nothing has happened.

One FMA person said to me all they had was anecdotal evidence there was a problem. Perhaps the most interesting comment was that if the FMA could find "evidence of potential harm occurring" then “yes that is something we will take action over."

The inertia in this area does tend to fuel theories that the big end of town exerts undue influence over things and that the regulators aren't keen on smaller KiwiSaver schemes.

Today we have run some interesting graphs on KiwiSaver funds and their fees versus performance - they make pretty interesting reading and have already started a good debate. We hope to be able to update this at a later stage with more info.

AML continues to occupy the minds (and task list) of advisers. The first annual returns are due in at the end of this month and we understand just over 100 of nearly 1000 responsible entities have filed their returns so far.

On the insurance front we are starting to see annual results come in. Partners Life has seen a big turn around from profit to loss. Story here. We will have some Sovereign numbers later today.

 

 

 

Comments (6)
Jim Dowsett
Don't forget that the FMA is now a self perpetuating bureaucracy and so nothing will ever be spot on or up to scratch! If it was there would be no reason to continue with all of the committees, big salaries, self importance and career advancement that constitutes the FMA. As for the banks acting with impunity don't forget who runs one of the big banks investment arm. Probably the most notorious KiwiSaver client strippers in the market! I have been informed personally by a non bank provider of KiwiSaver transfer forms arriving from a big bank unsigned by the client. Beat that! Hand wringing and hypocrisy rules from the FMA.
0 0
10 years ago

alan milton
Did the FMA give a reason for turning down a request for an interview? Whether they did or not, it's a pretty damning response and again illustrates a complete absence of any PR experience understanding
0 0
10 years ago

The Editor
Good question Traveller. After Kirsty made her speech we wanted to discuss a couple of things with her. When we made the approach the message was email your questions and we will provide answers. Unfortunately this approach is being adopted by a number of organisations. Our position is very clear on this. We don't do interviews by email. It is unprofessional, from a journalistic point of view. We don't think that approach is putting our clients' (readers) interests first. We are not in the business of publishing canned, PR controlled comments. This is an issue recently discussed in a forum for journalists and our position is the shared by other publishers. The irony is when the FMA's Elaine Campbell spoke at the IFA conference she extended an invitation for people to contact her and other senior FMA people directly if they wanted to discuss issues. Unfortunately with the media they take a very tightly controlled approach to communication, which frankly works against them.
0 0
10 years ago

alan milton
Good points Ellie. The FMA are all control freak socialists
0 0
10 years ago

alan milton
Editor: if the FMA woon't talk to journalists, what the IFA should do then is pick up the ball and ask questions of the FMA themselves. Are they planning to do this? If not, why not?
0 0
10 years ago

W K
@ellie: maybe this is what ALL advisers need to do, ring FMA for any clarifications and place on record their responses. Someone make a compilation of the responses. It will be interesting to know what those responses are. I am suggesting this because a few years ago I rang them for some clarification and this is was the response "you are advised to seek legal advice". At least one adviser I knew got the same reply. Ok, questions here: what if my legal adviser's interpretation is different from FMA's? My point? If the one who wrote the regulation can't tell those who are suppose to abide by it, then who can? I have rang IRD, LTA, Studylink, etc. they all gave me answers.
0 0
10 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.