4 min read
4 min read
4 min read
Regulation
GoodReturns TV
Watch: [GRTV] Stronger and more unified voice needed to force KiwiSaver changes
The Retirement Commissioner Jane Wrightson talks to Philip Macalister about changes she would like to see made to KiwiSaver.
Last Episodes
Regulation
Regulation
3 min read
2 min read
2 min read
3 min read
2 min read
Events
Nov 04
Monday
PAA Set B & C Workshop
Mercure Hotel, Dunedin
Nov 05
Tuesday
PAA Set B & C Workshop
ATCANZ Training Centre, Christchurch
Nov 06
Wednesday
PAA Set B & C Workshop
Wellington Central Library, Wellington
Regulation
1 min read
2 min read
1 min read
Most commented
Last comments
Subscribe now
Meet Our Investment Managers
Stephen Bennie
Greg Smith
Greg Smith is Head of Retail at Devon Funds.
PREMIUM
Get a premium subscription
Enjoy unlimited access to all of Good Returns by$0.99per week
As much as I disapprove of the ASB stance, I totally understand it, ESPECIALLY as the ComCom expect us to put an application to 4-5 banks, and not just the one we believe to suit the client the best. By demanding this, we would be tying the banks up with 4-5 times the applications necessary to secure a settlement. Banks would know that only 20-25% of applications are going to make it through to settlement. This shotgun approach is why banks are overloaded.
This is pure BS from the major banks. In front of ComCom earlier in the year they denied any policy of channel inequality yet there clearly is from some (at board level) both in turnaround times and cashbacks for example. They need to staff up, sort their antiquated IT and give Advisers the respect they deserve. New Zealand borrowers are voting with their feet and using Advisers more and more. Are some banks starting their pushback? One as done it before so no surprise there.
As a financial adviser, business owner and ex-banker/home lender in NZ & Australia with almost 20 years experience I can tell you that this is very concerning for several reasons - first one being that as bank staff you still get paid regardless of whether you put the approval thru, lazy/incompetent/time poor bankers are often declining loans rather than taking the time to push a difficult deal thru as they get paid either way, as a financial adviser who doesn't get paid unless the deal settles we are more committed to securing an approval which is why more volume now comes thru the broker channels. This feels like it's the banks way of reducing costs by not having to pay brokerage to advisers when bank lenders doing nothing should be sitting on the broker overflow lines. This directly affects small businesses and is another example of banks playing God & redirecting profit margins back to their own coffers - there is no valid excuse for branch lenders doing nothing to not be sitting on these overflow lines. It makes a mockery of giving the choice back to the clients who are already typically having poor banking experiences when dealing direct with bank staff.l and in no way supports small businesses already doing it tough.