| Log In Subscribe for $0.99/week
6
6 Comment
Save Story
News

FMA issues second robo advice licence

Monday 27th of August 2018

Nikko Asset Management has been granted an exemption to provide personalised digital investment advice by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA).

The decision makes Nikko AM NZ only the second financial services provider in New Zealand to be granted an exemption to the current law that says personalised advice to retail clients must be given by a natural person.

The exemption clears the way for Nikko AM NZ to launch an online service that will begin offering robo-advice to investors via a custom-made digital platform later this year.

Its platform will let users set financial goals and provide automated advice that’s backed up by the active management of Nikko AM’s domestic and international investment professionals.

Nikko AM managing director, George Carter says “Planning and setting savings and investment goals is something many of us know we should do, but often just don’t get around to. An online advice service that’s simple and easy to use, and helps you get comfort over your investment decisions, is clearly going to be of great value.”

“In being granted this exemption, Nikko AM NZ will be providing such a service to individuals later this year – basic advice that’s free for everyone to access, intuitive and available online 24/7. This development aligns with our values of innovation and commitment to helping people meet their financial goals, and follows on from our launch of the Nikko AM NZ KiwiSaver Scheme earlier this year, allowing Kiwis to invest directly with us for the first time.”

FMA Nikko AM roboadvice
Comments (6)
Clayton Coplestone
Interesting to see an increase in product manufacturers by-passing the advisory community with their own in-house distribution or gateways. It's much easier (and cheaper) to influence tied distribution that those pesky non-aligned AFAs
0 0
6 years ago
Chris Hardcastle
"Nikko Asset Management has been granted an exemption to provide personalised digital investment advice by the Financial Markets Authority (FMA)......... granted an exemption to the current law that says personalised advice to retail clients must be given by a natural person." I'm curious about the possibility of individual non aligned advisers being granted exemptions for legislative requirements in giving personalised advice. Would make the future somewhat easier for a number of us. What do you say, FMA - seeing how you are loosening up the laws for corporates, how about cutting us advisers some slack??
0 0
6 years ago
Three cents worth
My understanding is the exemption is only for the natural person requirement, all other rules apply the same as any other personlised advice provider.
0 0
6 years ago
Regan Thomas
Who writes the programs and algorithms that run the robots? Who sets the parameters that decide which investment mix and advice outcomes are recommended? That's right. Humans. The robots will be just as biased, as conflicted and as myopic as the individuals and institutions that build them - potentially more so because the outcomes are pre-built, totally pre-determined, and the consumer "discovers" them as they engage. They are just as fallible as natural humans, if not more so.
0 0
6 years ago
David Whyte
At the recent Lifetime Conference in ChCh, one of our guest speakers, David Haintz - previously of Shadforths, Australia - indicated that Roboadvice platforms across the Ditch had evolved beyond their original "robot" stage. Further down the track with this type of distribution than we are here, the Australian experience has seen ever increasing levels of human intervention. This suggests that despite the initial novelty of technology, investors are reluctant to rely on machines exclusively for such critical financial matters. I recall debating with Baz Read a few years back at an IFA Xmas function in Wellington on the impact of Roboadvice. I maintained then and I stick by it now, that Roboadvice should be a great lead generation source for Financial Advisers
0 0
6 years ago
Chris Hardcastle
@Dirty Harry You are quite right of course in that humans write the code. There is a chilling aspect to algorithms that all of us need to be aware of. This lengthy article is well worth the read, and makes specific mention of high frequency trading in share markets and how pricing is manipulated as a result. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/aug/29/coding-algorithms-frankenalgos-program-danger So, who really knows what is going on with Roboadvice........ I would like to bet those doling out licences don't.
0 0
6 years ago
Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.
Next Article
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
No plain sailing around Castle Point
No plain sailing around Castle Point
3 min read
Latest News
The run of play is towards more and more underwriting, and not just at the traditional new business stage
The run of play is towards more and more underwriting, and not just at the traditional new business stage
3 min read
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
NZ sharemarket starts week up 0.6%
NZ sharemarket starts week up 0.6%
4 min read
Can Games Teach Financial Literacy?
Can Games Teach Financial Literacy?
4 min read
News
More Read
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
No plain sailing around Castle Point
No plain sailing around Castle Point
3 min read
Failure to plan for data-hungry AI will have consequences
Failure to plan for data-hungry AI will have consequences
3 min read
NZ Super Fund terminates Devon mandate
NZ Super Fund terminates Devon mandate
1 min read
Latest Comments
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
As much as I disapprove of the ASB stance, I totally understand it, ESPECIALLY as the ComCom expect us to put an application to 4-5 banks, and not just the one we believe to suit the client the best. By demanding this, we would be tying the banks up with 4-5 times the applications necessary to secure a settlement. Banks would know that only 20-25% of applications are going to make it through to settlement. This shotgun approach is why banks are overloaded.
1 month ago Andy Phillipson
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
This is pure BS from the major banks. In front of ComCom earlier in the year they denied any policy of channel inequality yet there clearly is from some (at board level) both in turnaround times and cashbacks for example. They need to staff up, sort their antiquated IT and give Advisers the respect they deserve. New Zealand borrowers are voting with their feet and using Advisers more and more. Are some banks starting their pushback? One as done it before so no surprise there.
2 months ago Jeff Royle
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
As a financial adviser, business owner and ex-banker/home lender in NZ & Australia with almost 20 years experience I can tell you that this is very concerning for several reasons - first one being that as bank staff you still get paid regardless of whether you put the approval thru, lazy/incompetent/time poor bankers are often declining loans rather than taking the time to push a difficult deal thru as they get paid either way, as a financial adviser who doesn't get paid unless the deal settles we are more committed to securing an approval which is why more volume now comes thru the broker channels. This feels like it's the banks way of reducing costs by not having to pay brokerage to advisers when bank lenders doing nothing should be sitting on the broker overflow lines. This directly affects small businesses and is another example of banks playing God & redirecting profit margins back to their own coffers - there is no valid excuse for branch lenders doing nothing to not be sitting on these overflow lines. It makes a mockery of giving the choice back to the clients who are already typically having poor banking experiences when dealing direct with bank staff.l and in no way supports small businesses already doing it tough.
2 months ago Natasha Viliamu
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
Another major bank today has announced no pre approvals via Advisers for under 80% LVR. That's at least 3 of them. All applications whether direct or through Advisers should be given the same priority and go through the same assessment process. Banks don't appear to have invested (enough) in staff or technology and given how much money they make, it is unacceptable. Lets hope it gets sorted soon!
2 months ago Craig Pope
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
Sorry I don’t believe ASB are overrun with applications as we are traditional in a slow market so I think this” high volume “ excuse is rubbish, ASB will still post a massive profit due margins being so high but they can’t hire extra staff?? This is a disgrace! for consumers that choose to go through an independent mortgage adviser ASB are turning them away, but an ASB branch can write that deal no problem? , what happened to offering choice to the consumer? And being competitive? Are Comcom silent on this? Are the dealer groups /master FAP’s who have a monopoly over mortgage advisers’ access to bank mortgage lending silent on this? Why do we pay dealer groups /Master FAPs thousands in fees and costs if they can’t or don’t want to even back the people that pay their wages. All mortgage advisers want is an even playing field no more no less. How would ASB feel if all mortgage advisers in NZ stopped sending business to them for a few months?
2 months ago Valkyrie Vulcan