Regulation

Commerce Committee Chair has misgivings about QFE extension

Monday 10th of May 2010

During a submission from the New Zealand Bankers' Association, Dalziel said she had "very real doubts about the extensions in this area - we shouldn't be moving away from what we want to protect."

Her comments came after Institute of Financial Advisers President Lyn McMoran had earlier indicated her own concerns about the extension of the QFE regime. She said it would limit the viability of advisers being truly independent by giving their competitors who were in multiple QFES an advantage by reducing their costs.

"We're seeing product providers in the market trying to get advisers under their umbrella," she said. "If you get advisers under many QFEs, who will be taking responsibility for their competence?"

Susan Guthrie of the Consumer Institute was also critical of the QFE changes, saying the exemption for nominated advisers lacked any transparency, with corporate companies able to negotiate the terms of their application with the Securities Commission in a one-on-one basis.

Guthrie's submission called for a pause to the legislation, saying it had failed to address the real problem, which was a complete transformation of the retail adviser market.

"The market has failed to deliver what consumers want," she told the committee.

Comments (2)
Clayton Coplestone
David - your comments are correct The NZ Regulator is out of their depth... and have been so for some time. It's well past time for adults to take over
0 0
14 years ago

W K
Re: David Whyte. Agreed. The whole system could have been simplified. Eg, have a certificate for those wanting to practice the respective class of business - life & health, fire & general, investment and mortgage/lending. Each certificate to cover the 4 main areas - administration, product knowledge, practice & compliance and law relating to the respective business. They cannot call themselves financial advisors, specialists, planners, etc. Just simply life & health advisor, specialists, etc. or mortgage advisor, planner, etc. In otherwords, the word financial or finance cannot be used in the title at all. To be a financial planner, that is one who is able to use the financial or finance title, one will have to do all the mentioned 4 certificates plus basic taxation, estate planning (Wills & Trusts, etc) and economics. This followed by a 1 or 2 year internship or mentoring. Is it all too late to change anything now?
0 0
14 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.