| Log In Subscribe for $0.99/week
Jenha White
Jenha White
4
4 Comment
Save Story
Regulation

Industry delighted with voluntary authorisation

Wednesday 22nd of September 2010

Cabinet today agreed for regulations to be developed to allow voluntary authorisation for mortgage brokers and insurance advisers under the Financial Advisers Act (FAA).

Commerce Minister Simon Power says the regulation is likely to be passed before December.

This came about after changes to the Financial Advisers Act in June gave no authority to the Securities Commission to grant authorisation to mortgage and insurance providers, providing no clear pathway for those industries under regulation.

Many insurance and mortgage adviser firms had committed millions of dollars to the authorisation process and ETITO said over 3,300 insurance or mortgage advisers had enrolled in training for the National Certificate in Financial Services [Financial Advice] [Level 5] for the purposes of authorisation at the time.

As a result many category two advisers postponed courses while they waited for further information about the prospect of voluntary authorisation.

New Zealand Mortgage Brokers Association (NZMBA) chairman and chief executive Darren Pratley says today's announcement to allow voluntary authorisation has made the association "very happy".

"The association has put a lot of resources into this issue and it is relieved and encouraged that the Government has listened to the industry and made changes that are realistic."

He says a pathway is now available for mortgage and insurance advisers to go forward with personal continued development of service.

Life Brokers Association (LBA) president Ron Flood says he welcomes the commitment by Government to enact the regulation before December so mortgage and insurance advisers that have commenced with education can be well placed to be authorised early in 2011.

Professional Advisers Association (PAA) chief executive Edward Richards says it is great news that the associations have finally been listened to.

"The whole question mark has been taken out of the regime - there is now a voluntary option and clarity."

ETITO manager of strategy and corporate relations Michael Frampton says ETITO is "absolutely delighted" with the decision which can only be good for advisers, for industry and for New Zealand consumers.

He says there has never been a better time for category two advisers to access the training and assessment they need to become authorised and he urges advisers to get involved in the process.

 

Comments (4)
Brent Lewis
Personally, I don't think being an AFA will make much difference to clients at all. Anyone who's been selling insurance for over 10 years, is obviously doing something right. However it might make some advisers fell better about themselves.
0 0
14 years ago
Simon Rule
People let’s not split any hairs over this whole saga called Regulation. The whole point of regulation in the first place was to combat the appalling advice and practices of those investment advisers around New Zealand who over the years have signed up investors to finance companies etc that were only ever going to fall over. Organisations like ETITO saw this as a great opportunity to lobby the industry to include insurance advisers and mortgage brokers within the scope of regulation. Naturally this would be great news for ETITO if insurance advisers and mortgage brokers had to go through training also! Insurance companies being the slow moving organisations that they are followed what they “thought” the Government would decide and blindly committed their advisers to training courses even before the Government had made up its mind whether to include insurance and mortgage advisers within the scope of regulation. The banks themselves being less willing to be sheep than the insurance companies looked at the logistics of having ALL of their front line staff who deal with mortgages and insurance authorised and lobbied the Government against regulation. The Government recognised that it would be hypocritical to say to the banks “your staff advise on mortgages and insurance but don’t need to be authorised” and then say the exact opposite to mortgage brokers and insurance advisers. This is why the Government has said that it is not compulsory for insurance advisers and mortgage brokers to become authorised, they simply need to be registered instead. Whilst the banks would have paid for the training of their staff to go through regulation mortgage brokers would in most cases had to have worn that cost themselves. This was also recognised by the Government as being detrimental to consumers as many brokers would have simply left the industry meaning their experience on advising on mortgages would have been lost. I applaud the Government for looking at the big picture and not making authorisation of mortgage brokers and insurance advisers compulsory.
0 0
14 years ago
W K
I've been in this industry for almost 30yrs in 2 countries, and my experiences are the same for both - clients know their advisor's sincerity and knowledge. I have dealt with probably 1,000 clients, so far, none has ever asked me for my qualifications or which professional body I belong to, and 90% of my businesses come from existing clients and referrals. If you are good, your clients will follow you regardless of which organisation you join. Having said that, I do mean regulation is not needed, but it has to be practical and meaningful.
0 0
14 years ago
W K
Correction - 2nd last line should read as "I do NOT mean regulation is not needed...
0 0
14 years ago
Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.
Next Article
FARs - where's the accountability?
FARs - where's the accountability?
3 min read
FMA warns on AML, won't name and shame
FMA warns on AML, won't name and shame
2 min read
Latest News
The run of play is towards more and more underwriting, and not just at the traditional new business stage
The run of play is towards more and more underwriting, and not just at the traditional new business stage
3 min read
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
Value of index tracking seen in the numbers, says Kernel
3 min read
NZ sharemarket starts week up 0.6%
NZ sharemarket starts week up 0.6%
4 min read
Can Games Teach Financial Literacy?
Can Games Teach Financial Literacy?
4 min read
Regulation
More Read
FARs - where's the accountability?
FARs - where's the accountability?
3 min read
FMA warns on AML, won't name and shame
FMA warns on AML, won't name and shame
2 min read
Client-first may be too big an ask for biggest players
Client-first may be too big an ask for biggest players
5 min read
Call for more scrutiny of regulators
Call for more scrutiny of regulators
2 min read
Latest Comments
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
As much as I disapprove of the ASB stance, I totally understand it, ESPECIALLY as the ComCom expect us to put an application to 4-5 banks, and not just the one we believe to suit the client the best. By demanding this, we would be tying the banks up with 4-5 times the applications necessary to secure a settlement. Banks would know that only 20-25% of applications are going to make it through to settlement. This shotgun approach is why banks are overloaded.
1 month ago Andy Phillipson
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
This is pure BS from the major banks. In front of ComCom earlier in the year they denied any policy of channel inequality yet there clearly is from some (at board level) both in turnaround times and cashbacks for example. They need to staff up, sort their antiquated IT and give Advisers the respect they deserve. New Zealand borrowers are voting with their feet and using Advisers more and more. Are some banks starting their pushback? One as done it before so no surprise there.
2 months ago Jeff Royle
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
As a financial adviser, business owner and ex-banker/home lender in NZ & Australia with almost 20 years experience I can tell you that this is very concerning for several reasons - first one being that as bank staff you still get paid regardless of whether you put the approval thru, lazy/incompetent/time poor bankers are often declining loans rather than taking the time to push a difficult deal thru as they get paid either way, as a financial adviser who doesn't get paid unless the deal settles we are more committed to securing an approval which is why more volume now comes thru the broker channels. This feels like it's the banks way of reducing costs by not having to pay brokerage to advisers when bank lenders doing nothing should be sitting on the broker overflow lines. This directly affects small businesses and is another example of banks playing God & redirecting profit margins back to their own coffers - there is no valid excuse for branch lenders doing nothing to not be sitting on these overflow lines. It makes a mockery of giving the choice back to the clients who are already typically having poor banking experiences when dealing direct with bank staff.l and in no way supports small businesses already doing it tough.
2 months ago Natasha Viliamu
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
Another major bank today has announced no pre approvals via Advisers for under 80% LVR. That's at least 3 of them. All applications whether direct or through Advisers should be given the same priority and go through the same assessment process. Banks don't appear to have invested (enough) in staff or technology and given how much money they make, it is unacceptable. Lets hope it gets sorted soon!
2 months ago Craig Pope
New customers locked out of ASB’s pre-approvals
Sorry I don’t believe ASB are overrun with applications as we are traditional in a slow market so I think this” high volume “ excuse is rubbish, ASB will still post a massive profit due margins being so high but they can’t hire extra staff?? This is a disgrace! for consumers that choose to go through an independent mortgage adviser ASB are turning them away, but an ASB branch can write that deal no problem? , what happened to offering choice to the consumer? And being competitive? Are Comcom silent on this? Are the dealer groups /master FAP’s who have a monopoly over mortgage advisers’ access to bank mortgage lending silent on this? Why do we pay dealer groups /Master FAPs thousands in fees and costs if they can’t or don’t want to even back the people that pay their wages. All mortgage advisers want is an even playing field no more no less. How would ASB feel if all mortgage advisers in NZ stopped sending business to them for a few months?
2 months ago Valkyrie Vulcan