Shorter version of return gets green light
The returns are required as part of the new reporting requirements for AFAs.
The first return has to be filed by September 30 this year, covering their business activities up until June 30.
The confirmation of the questions follows two rounds of consultation.
The first draft of the return ran to more than 20 pages and 73 questions. It asked for details of an adviser’s income, which many complained was a breach of privacy.
Associations raised concerns that collecting previously unrequired information would require new CRM systems and add work for advisers.
Questions in the final set include a request for details of any benefits provided from product providers, numbers of clients and transactions, persistency rates, and broking services.
Those that have been dropped include a section on competence, investment returns, income, businesses’ staff structures, advisers’ remuneration structures and the age of their clients.
The FMA says the questions AFAs must answer will depend on their situation, including the types of financial advice services offered. It says the purpose of the report is to better understand businesses, their compliance approach and approach to CPD. “It will also help us focus our monitoring and surveillance work and how best to apply our resources.”
It said it would soon provide more information, including confirmation of timeframes and when the return would be available online.
It has also issued a reminder to advisers that compliance with the record-keeping standards of the Code of Professional Conduct for AFAs remained an important focus of ongoing monitoring.
It says the information required to be recorded in relation to each client must be sufficient to demonstrate compliance with the code and include copies of all information and documents provided to or received from the client in writing, in connection with the AFA’s personalised services.
“We expect AFAs to proactively ensure their record keeping meets this standard at to take any steps necessary to improve their processes if they don’t meet this standard. Without proper record-keeping it can be difficult or impossible to demonstrate whether the financial services provided to your clients are suitable.”
It says its response to non-compliance is proportionate to the circumstances. “We are unlikely to take formal action where a breach is a one-off, and includes minor events relating to a technical error or similar issues unless there are other compelling reasons to do so.”
But it says where there is evidence the breaches are intentional or reckless or involve other serious unlawful conduct, the FMA would take action such as a referral to the FADC.