Regulation

Voluntary AFAs 'ahead of the game'

Wednesday 25th of April 2012

There are several types of Authorised Financial Adviser, including Category 2 AFAs, who must follow the AFA code of conduct but are unable to provide advice on Category 1 products including KiwiSaver.

This means they can't advise on anything beyond what a Registered Financial Adviser can, but they are held to a higher standard than an RFA on the advice they provide.

Tate spoke highly of those who have taken the path of voluntary authorisation, saying it will increase their professionalism and put them in a good position if the current regulatory requirements for advisers are ramped up at some point in the future.

He said making such a choice indicates "commitment to the profession", given it involves higher costs and liability than remaining an RFA.

"It's a real credit to those that have done it - professionally it's the right thing to do and I think they are getting ahead of the game.

"The IFA is encouraging people to, rather than having to respond or react to regulation, be ahead of it."

An increase in the minimum requirements for advisers is almost inevitable at some point, but when that will happen will depend on the political climate, Tate said.

"It is the IFA's view that over time there will be a need for a closing of the gap between authorised advisers and registered but not authorised advisers."

A knowledgeable source told Good Returns the Category 2 AFA designation came about "quite late in the development" of the Financial Advisers Act after lobbying by insurance advisers.

"They [insurance advisers] had embraced the whole thing and wanted to take the step up in professionalism but the Act was changed so most of what they did didn't require them to become an AFA."

Comments (4)
Mike King
Bazza - exactly what I have done. Was all there - with Capstone C, the Code B, Part A, and Part E papers all done, but then was relieved of the IMPERATIVE to become "authorised". However, I will when I either HAVE to or when it makes more sense to do so than not.
0 0
12 years ago

Mike King
The (somewhat maligned) TNP PA, perhaps, Graeme?
0 0
12 years ago

Ron Flood
Mike, the Life Brokers Association have been supporting RFA's from day one. If you research the submissions to the Code Committee made on behalf of LBA members you will see that the LBA went out on a limb in the fight against the requirement to have all advisers Authorized. The argument is well documented and in the end common sense prevailed. Graeme, as a past member of the LBA, I am surprised that you seem to have forgotten your 'roots'.
0 0
12 years ago

Mike King
Ron, yes - I know about LBA's position. At present though, only TNP has made a specific effort to provide RFAs with some level of "certification" through their PA. Is the LBA working on somnething like this too?
0 0
12 years ago

Comments to GoodReturns.co.nz go through an approval process. Comments which are defamatory, abusive or in some way deemed inappropriate will not be approved.